Abbreviation used: WIBSNSCTTA (Woman in Blue Saree Not Showing Cleavage This Time Around)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Followers,
there is a limit to me supporting non-violence. And that limit has been crossed.
The pain has been caused by the makers of a pain relief balm, Amrutanjan.
And that's not the last of the cruel jokes.
I wrote about their a-la-savita-bhabhi ad a few months back, but evidently the post has not been read in the exalted echelons of the advertising agency responsible. Perhaps they were busy taking cleavage screen tests for the next ad. And here is the result of it:
I can see a lot of changes from the last time, but it is extremely difficult to decide which commercial is worse.
1] The WIBSNSCTTA's saree colour has changed.
2] The WIBSNSCTTA belongs to an older age bracket.
3] This time both the WIBSNSCTTA and the guy in pain are not taking public transport.
4] The wife has a small role to play this time! She applies the product on her husband. So what if he still asks WIBSNSCTTA out to dinner as a result?
6] Much like last time, there are a lot of questions about the plot, such as, why does WIBSNSCTTA drop the guy home instead of apply the cream herself, but let them be.
7] In all this the much anticipated 'pronounced cleavage' is missing, but viewers still can't see the packshot because they are doubling up in pain by then.
Which is a better commercial of the two? This is like asking would you like to get hit on the head with a large stone painted blue or painted red? The correct answer would be - "Just don't!" But since when television viewers had such luxuries?
I am on a month long fast, and this time, I am going to pull in BABA, too, who sent me the link to this commercial in the first place!
Jai Second Coming! Jai Hind!
- Anna.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Followers,
there is a limit to me supporting non-violence. And that limit has been crossed.
The pain has been caused by the makers of a pain relief balm, Amrutanjan.
And that's not the last of the cruel jokes.
I wrote about their a-la-savita-bhabhi ad a few months back, but evidently the post has not been read in the exalted echelons of the advertising agency responsible. Perhaps they were busy taking cleavage screen tests for the next ad. And here is the result of it:
I can see a lot of changes from the last time, but it is extremely difficult to decide which commercial is worse.
1] The WIBSNSCTTA's saree colour has changed.
2] The WIBSNSCTTA belongs to an older age bracket.
3] This time both the WIBSNSCTTA and the guy in pain are not taking public transport.
4] The wife has a small role to play this time! She applies the product on her husband. So what if he still asks WIBSNSCTTA out to dinner as a result?
6] Much like last time, there are a lot of questions about the plot, such as, why does WIBSNSCTTA drop the guy home instead of apply the cream herself, but let them be.
7] In all this the much anticipated 'pronounced cleavage' is missing, but viewers still can't see the packshot because they are doubling up in pain by then.
Which is a better commercial of the two? This is like asking would you like to get hit on the head with a large stone painted blue or painted red? The correct answer would be - "Just don't!" But since when television viewers had such luxuries?
I am on a month long fast, and this time, I am going to pull in BABA, too, who sent me the link to this commercial in the first place!
Jai Second Coming! Jai Hind!
- Anna.
